USPTO serial 77488613
ECOSTROKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOSTROKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth F. Janda
ELIZABETH F. JANDA BROOKS KUSHMAN P. C.1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles and automobile engines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |