Drawing for ROCKY CLIFFS PIPELINE

USPTO serial 77488854

ROCKY CLIFFS PIPELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKY CLIFFS PIPELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julianna P. Deligans

JULIANNA P. DELIGANS HALL ESTILL100 N. BROADWAYCHASE TOWER, SUITE 2900OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Covering, coating, and maintenance of pipelines; laying and construction of pipelines; pipeline installation and repairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 24, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance