Drawing for ONE SOURCE LIGHTER SOLUTION

USPTO serial 77488932

ONE SOURCE LIGHTER SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HODGES, KOURTNEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ONE SOURCE LIGHTER SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Joseph Trojan

R. JOSEPH TROJAN TROJAN LAW OFFICES9250 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 325BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3376UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces and candlesACTIVEJun 1, 2006
034Cigar lighters; Cigarette lighters not for land vehicles; Cigarette lighters not of precious metal; Lighters for smokers; Lighters not of precious metal; Non-electric cigar lighters not of precious metalACTIVEJun 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 26, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 27, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 27, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance