USPTO serial 77489027
IPULSE EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPULSE EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Swansea SA1 8PJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Hein
LAURA J. HEIN GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETTPO BOX 2906MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0906UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 1B and 44E) Flashlamps; phototherapeutic apparatus for cosmetic purposes; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Flashlamps for phototherapeutic purposes; phototherapeutic apparatus for medical purposes; phototherapeutic apparatus for surgical purposes; optical apparatus for use in therapeutic treatments, namely, hair removal, treatment of vascular and pigmented lesions, skin rejuvenation, removal of freckles and age spots, treatment of uneven pigmentation of the skin, treatment of blemishes, treatment of thread veins, non-ablative wrinkle reduction, treatment of acne; flashlights for medical treatment and surgical treatments, namely, flashlamps; phototherapeutic apparatus for cosmetic purposes, namely, for the removal of unwanted hair and treatment of skin conditions; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and servicing of phototherapeutic medical and non-medical apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational, training and instructional services, namely, providing classes and seminars in the fields of medicine, health and beauty; organising seminars and training sessions in the fields of medicine, health and beauty; provision of instruction in the fields of medicine, health and/or beauty | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Beauty care services; beauty treatment services, namely, beauty spa services including cosmetic body and facial care treatment; beauty salon services; medical, hygienic and beauty care services; rental of machines and apparatus for use in beauty salons or barbers' shops; depilatory hair removal services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CyDen Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named IPULSE EXPERIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |