Drawing for THINK COMMON

USPTO serial 77489541

THINK COMMON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK COMMON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rod S. Berman

Rod S. Berman Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mangels1900 Avenue of the Stars7th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90067-4308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, jackets, hooded sweatshirts and sweatshirts; headgear, namely, hats, caps, baseball caps, visors; footwear, all to be sold in conjunction with displays and/or references to the artist CommonACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, live musical performances, motion picture and television program production, audio recording and production, music publishing services, music composition and transcription for others; entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of comedy, variety, and musical performancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 4, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 18, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 17, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jan 15, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 10, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance