USPTO serial 77489679
AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2012
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLP1 LOGAN SQ FL 9PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business information management in the field of heavy civil construction; supply services for third parties in the field of construction materials, namely, purchase of aggregate, asphalt, and concrete for other companies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 6, 1998 |
| 037 | Building construction for residential, commercial, and institutional use; excavation services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 6, 1998 |
| 040 | Quarry services in the nature of stone-crushing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Infrastructure, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named AMERICAN INFRASTRUCTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |