USPTO serial 77489890
ROLZOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROLZOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Södertälje, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wm. Charles Saunders
WM. CHARLES SAUNDERS ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP1800 CONCORD PIKEOW2WILMINGTON, DE 19850-5437Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of diseases and disorders of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory and nervous systems; Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of pain, inflammation and infection; Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cancer, diabetes, obesity, and psychiatric and neurological diseases and disorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |