USPTO serial 77493107
CITY DEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITY DEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
Circuit City Stores West Coast, Inc.
Westminster, CO
Other trademarks owned by Circuit City Stores West Coast, Inc.
Circuit City Stores West Coast, Inc.
Westminster, CO
Other trademarks owned by Circuit City Stores West Coast, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan D. Adams
DAVID W DENENBERG ESQ CIRCUITCITY.COM INC.11 Harbor Park DrivePort Washington, NY 11050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio, video, and electronic equipment and computer hardware, namely, MP3 players, DVD players and recorders, compact disc players and recorders, portable compact disc players and recorders, televisions, stereo receivers, audio speakers, video cassette recorders, audio cassette players, portable media players; mini systems, namely, audio speakers, subwoofers, audio-video receivers, stereo tuners, amplifiers, microphones, DVD and compact disc players sold as a unit; computer and electronic software for use in operating systems and video games; home theater systems, namely, audio speakers, subwoofers, audiovisual receivers, stereo tuners, amplifiers, microphones, DVD and compact disc players sold as a unit; mini-disc players and recorders, two-way radios, cameras, personal computers; satellite navigation systems, namely, global positioning system (GPS); headphones and headsets for use with MP3 players, DVD players, compact disc players, televisions, stereo receivers, video cassette recorders, audio cassette players, miniature stereo systems, and home theater stereo systems; protective carrying cases for portable music players, namely, MP3 players, DVD players and compact disc players; television and video converters; remote controls for use with DVD players, compact disc players, televisions, stereo receivers, portable media players, miniature stereo systems, and home theater stereo systems; cables for electrical or optical signal or electrical transmission; computer game programs and electronic game programs; uninterrupted power supplies; wireless telephones and wireless telephone accessories, namely, cases for mobile phones, battery chargers, car chargers for mobile telephone batteries, mounting brackets, hands free adapters, telephone headsets, earplugs not for medical purposes, specialty holster for carrying cellular phones, pagers, portable music players, and personal digital assistants, electrical power extension cords, and batteries; computer hardware accessories, namely, computer memory hardware, video and audio cards that are installed into a personal computer, video monitors, and printers; camera accessories, namely, battery testers, power supplies, blank video tapes, digital film recorders, flash memory card, memory cards, microprocessors, chip card readers, camera lenses, blank audio tapes, digital and video camera carrying cases, bags for cameras and photographic equipment, cables for electrical or optical signal transmission, cable connectors, optical fibers sold as a component of fiber optical cables, adapters; personal digital assistants; all of the above-referenced goods provided bundled together in packages of related items | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CIRCUITCITY.COM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POCAHONTAS ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Circuit City Stores West Coast, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Circuit City Stores West Coast, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CITY DEAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 27, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 4, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |