USPTO serial 77493182
ELASTOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELASTOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for enhancing the performance of lubricating oils, greases and internal combustion engine fuels; Chemical additives for oil well drilling fluid; Chemical additives for oils; Oil reclamation fluid for the separation of crude oil from soil and water | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RFSH | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING RECEIVED | — |