USPTO serial 77493428
THEECOSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THEECOSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Asan, Chungnam, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Lynn Perry
E. LYNN PERRY PERRY IP GROUP ALC4 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 39SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Combs; Tooth brushes; Brooms; Scrubbing brushes; Trash cans and dust bins; Rags for cleaning; Brushes for cleaning tanks and containers; Non-electric cooking pans; Non-electric frying pans; Mugs; Paper cups; Cutting boards; Chopsticks; Vacuum bottles; Flower vases; Plastic cups; Bowls, not of precious metal; Trays, not of precious metal; Cruets, not of precious metal; Household containers, not of precious metal; Bottles for beverages and food; Dishes; Buckets; Non-electric kettles; Water bottles; Nests of food boxes; Lunch boxes; Gloves for household purposes; Mess-tins; Washtubs; Toilet paper holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services relating to bath articles and kitchen utensils; Advertising agencies; On-line advertising on a computer network; Sales promotion for others; Business management assistance; Business information; Advisory services for business management; Auctioneering; Import-export agencies; Procurement services for others, namely, purchasing goods and services for other business; Demonstration of goods; Franchising services relating to kitchen utensils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |