USPTO serial 77493608
CRAP AND COUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2010
- Examiner
- CARLSON, KRISTIN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with CRAP AND COUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anaheim, CA
Orange, CA
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [ Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, footwear, underwear, headwear, dresses, coats, jackets, gloves, mittens, scarves, shirts, blouses, pants, and shorts ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 2, 2010 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line journal, namely, a blog featuring fashion regarding the field of fashion, clothing, and accessories | ACTIVE | Jun 6, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edmiston, Michael Scott
- Other trademarks owned by Edmiston, Christine Dankevich
- Other trademarks owned by Edmiston, Christine Dankevich
- Other trademarks owned by Edmiston, Christine Dankevich
- Other trademarks owned by Edmiston, Michael Scott
- Other trademarks owned by Edmiston, Michael Scott
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CRAP AND COUTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |