USPTO serial 77493855
MIGHTY SHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2009
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIGHTY SHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montgomeryville, PA
Montgomeryville, PA
Montgomeryville, PA
TREVOSE, PA
Trevose, PA
Trevose, PA
Trevose, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin L. Faigus
MARTIN L. FAIGUS CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD.1635 MARKET ST FL 11PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | kits consisting primarily of metal plates sold with sodium bicarbonate for use with water to clean metals and gems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plymouth Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Plymouth Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Plymouth Direct, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURES PILLOWS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Direct Response, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Direct Response, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Direct Response, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MIGHTY SHINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |