USPTO serial 77493935
EVERYTHING WE PUT IN AND ON OUR BODIES MUST BE NUTRITIOUS AND SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERYTHING WE PUT IN AND ON OUR BODIES MUST BE NUTRITIOUS AND SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq.
SHERRI L. ROHLF, ESQ. SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER, P.A.100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; Personal care products, namely, moisturizing body oils and body lotions; and household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleaners, dish detergent, laundry detergent, and cleaners for use on fabric, floors, walls, and windows; breath fresheners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named EVERYTHING WE PUT IN AND ON OUR BODIES MUST BE NUTRITIOUS AND SAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |