USPTO serial 77494920
Z A N A D A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3925981Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 1, 2011
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Z A N A D A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
xxx xxxxxx, CA
xxxxx xxxxxx, CA
PALO ALTO, CA
PALO ALTO, CA
xxxxx xxxxx, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; shirts; socks; sweat shirts; T-shirts; tank tops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by xxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx
- Other trademarks owned by xxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxx
- Other trademarks owned by ZANADA
- Other trademarks owned by ZANADA
- Other trademarks owned by xxxxxxx, xxxxxxxx
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named Z A N A D A
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |