USPTO serial 77495366
RFINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RFINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Idaho Falls, ID
IDAHO FALLS, ID
Idaho Falls, ID
Idaho Falls, ID
Idaho Falls, ID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Stroder
Rebecca Stroder SNR Denton US LLPWacker Drive Station, Willis TowerP.O. Box 061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical devices, namely, data processing devices for communication with cards, namely, data processors for communication with chip cards having an integrated circuit and cards having a contactless interface, data processing devices, namely, data processors for writing data into or onto chip cards, for reading data out of or from chip cards, and for displaying data from chip cards on a display, data processing devices, namely, data processors for personalizing chip cards, machine-readable recording mediums, namely, chip cards having an integrated circuit for storing, processing and providing data and programs, cards having an integrated circuit, namely, electronic chip cards having micro processors for communication with external data processors or with mobile radio terminals, coded telecommunication cards, namely, chip cards, coded cards having a contactless interface, namely, chip cards having an antenna, integrated circuits having characteristic physical properties for protection against forgery for and in connection with cards, namely, electronic chip cards, electrical devices for processing and securing data, namely, encrypting data for cash-less payment transactions, both in online operation and in offline operation, namely, for payment transactions using magnetic stripe cards and electronic chip cards, computer software for applications in computer networks, namely, computer software for processing transactions and data adaptable with internet, intranet and extranet applications, computer software for telecommunication with chip card-activated mobile phones and associated chip cards and mobile phones, computer software programs for activating, changing, testing and displaying data and software structures stored in telecommunication cards, computer software for encrypting and signing data, computer operating system software and computer application software for cards having an integrated circuit, namely, electronic chip cards, computer software for data processors for communication with chip cards, computer programs for developing, managing and maintaining all the above-mentioned kinds of software, recording mediums, namely, data recorders, used in connection with the above-mentioned software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RFINITY US, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RFINITY US, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RFinity, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RFinity, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RFinity, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RFINITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |