Drawing for THE MARRIAGE REFEREE

USPTO serial 77496941

THE MARRIAGE REFEREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MARRIAGE REFEREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elise Tenen-Aoki

ELISE TENEN-AOKI GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP2450 COLORADO AVE STE 400ESANTA MONICA, CA 90404-5524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, an on-going television program in the field of comedy and relationships; entertainment services in the nature of an on-going reality based television program; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring on-going television program and video clips in the field of comedy and relationships, entertainment related news and information and comedic commentary relating to relationshipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 22, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 13, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 11, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2008AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance