USPTO serial 77497344
SOLVING THE CASH FLOW NEEDS OF BUSINESSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SOLVING THE CASH FLOW NEEDS OF BUSINESSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beach Commercial Finance, Inc.
Virginia Beach, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
Beach Commercial Finance, Inc.
Virginia Beach, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Factoring agencies | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beach Commercial Finance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMERCIAL CASH FLOW, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Beach Commercial Finance, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SOLVING THE CASH FLOW NEEDS OF BUSINESSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 26, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 26, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |