USPTO serial 77497377
ECOHIDES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOHIDES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rafi Ourfalian, Esq.
BENJAMIN AYDINDZHYAN OURFALIAN & OURFALIAN700 NORTH BRAND BOULEVARDSUITE 1150GLENDALE, CA 91203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather | ACTIVE | Dec 11, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |