USPTO serial 77497702
N.4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N.4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
DANIEL M. CISLO CISLO & THOMAS, LLP1333 2ND ST STE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-4100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body care products, namely, body cleansing soap and gel, body scrub exfoliant, body creams, skin toner, skin moisturizer with sun protection factor, hand creams and lotions; bath products, namely, bath and shower gels, bath and shower washes; hair care products, namely, hair rinses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |