USPTO serial 77497875
DECONSTRUCTED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DECONSTRUCTED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal QC, CA
Montreal QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Educational computer programs, namely, children's educational software and educational software featuring instruction in the fields of science and technology, computer game programs; pre-recorded electronic and digital media featuring educational programs in the fields of science and technology, documentary programs in the fields of science and technology, motion pictures about science and technology, educational games, computer games, films about science and technology, television programs about science and technology and educational material in the fields of science and technology; Downloadable educational software programs in the fields of science and technology, documentary programs in the fields of science and technology, motion pictures about science and technology, educational games, computer games, films about science and technology, television programs about science and technology and educational material in the fields of science and technology; educational computer software, namely, educational software about science and technology, educational software featuring instruction in science and technology; computer game software; downloadable books and newsletters in the fields of science and technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on 44(e)) Entertainment services in the nature of providing educational and documentary programs in the field of science and technology, television programs in the field of science and technology and motion picture films in the field of science and technology via television, video and computer networks; production of educational and documentary programs, television programs and motion picture films; distribution of educational and documentary television series, television programs and motion picture films; entertainment services, namely, educational and documentary television series, television programs and motion picture films provided through cable television, broadcast television and webcasts; providing information about educational programs, documentary programs, television programs and motion picture films and productions of programs, documentary programs, television programs and motion picture films via a global computer network; providing educational programs in the field of science and technology, documentary programs in the field of science and technology, television programs in the field of science and technology, and motion picture films in the field of science and technology, via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |