Drawing for GAMELOFT

USPTO serial 77497924

GAMELOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMELOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristen M. Walsh

KRISTEN M. WALSH NIXON PEABODY LLP1300 CLINTON SQUAREROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for electronic games and entertainment, namely, computer game software used and played on mobile and cellular telephones, handheld computers, personal computers and personal digital assistants; downloadable electronic game programs via the internet and wireless devices; downloadable voice ring tones downloaded from the internet and wireless devices; downloadable voice ring tones for mobile telecommunications devices; computer software for wall papers, namely, still images for use in backgrounds on mobile phone screens; computer screen saver software; computer software for processing animated images for use on mobile phone screens; and programs for downloading images to mobile telecommunication devices, namely, mobile and cellular telephones, handheld computers, personal computers and personal digital assistants via the global computer network and wireless devices; and computer software for use in the design, development and execution of wireless computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 23, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance