Drawing for GAMELOFT

USPTO serial 77497926

GAMELOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMELOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristen M. Walsh

Kristen M. Walsh Nixon Peabody LLP1100 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes, namely, paper bags, envelopes and paper pouches for packaging; printed matter, namely, books, manuals, magazines, prospectuses, and leaflets all featuring video and computer games; stationery; bookbinding material; photographs; adhesive cardboards for stationery; artists' materials, namely, sketch pads, drawing pads and paint brushes; office requisites, namely, rubber bands and paper clips; instructional and teaching material in the field of video and computer games; video game user and strategy guides; plastic materials for packaging, namely, bags, envelopes and pouches; pens, pencils, stationery; and dry transfer print charactersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 5, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance