Drawing for NEWSOPOLY

USPTO serial 77497995

NEWSOPOLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEWSOPOLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mitchell Zimmerman, Linda G. Henry

MITCHELL ZIMMERMAN, LINDA G. HENRY FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, reports, studies, written articles, journals, and directories on the publications of others, archived publications of others, and content of other publishers; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, pamphlets, newspapers, journals, magazines, and written articles on news and current eventsACTIVE
041providing online searchable databases on current events, historical news events, and news in the fields of education, entertainment, sports, recreation, and leisure; providing online publications in the nature of newsletters, reports, studies, written articles, journals, blogs, and directories in the fields of current events, publications of others, archived publications of others, content of other publishers, historical news events, and news in the fields of education, entertainment, sports, recreation, and leisureACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 9, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 8, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 2, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 30, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 24, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 9, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 5, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
May 5, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 5, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2011EAREEARLY EXTENSION OF USE REFUSED
Mar 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 25, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 26, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 24, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 17, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jun 16, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance