USPTO serial 77497997
PEACE & LOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2013
- Examiner
- BERNS, LEE ANNE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PEACE & LOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tal Grinblat
Tal Grinblat LEWITT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO, MARSHALL & HARLAN16633 VENTURA BLVD., STE 1100ENCINO, CA 91436-1865UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Peace & Love Jewelry by Nancy Davis LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named PEACE & LOVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 3, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |