USPTO serial 77498634
MED SCHOOL 2.0
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MED SCHOOL 2.0?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner, Esq.
Mark A. Steiner Duane Morris LLPSpear Tower, One Market Plaza, Ste. 2200San Francisco, CA 94105-1127UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Informational videos, all pertaining to medical topics and informational diagnostic tests and algorithms upon which they are based; sound, video and data recordings, namely, MPEGs and digital audio and video compression files featuring information related to healthcare and medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Arranging subscription services of the online electronic publications of others, namely, books, journals, newsletters and informational videos and transcripts thereof in the fields of healthcare and medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting training and seminars via informational videos, and online testing, in the fields of healthcare and medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MED SCHOOL 2.0
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |