USPTO serial 77499154
APPOTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPOTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nova Santa Rita, BR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Loudspeakers; Sub-woofers; Tweeters; Woofers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |