Drawing for FLORSIL

USPTO serial 77499543

FLORSIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLORSIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brick G. Power

BRICK G POWER DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR111 EAST BROADWAYSUITE 900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations for controlling alkalinity of concrete, masonry, or stone surfacesACTIVEApr 29, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 11, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 21, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 1, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 1, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 1, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2010CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2009CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 4, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 3, 2009INOAAMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance