Drawing for SPMT SERIAL PORT MEMORY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 77500089

SPMT SERIAL PORT MEMORY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPMT SERIAL PORT MEMORY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda G. Henry

LINDA G. HENRY FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETSILICON VALLEY CENTERMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mobile devices, namely, portable and handheld digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, manipulating, and reviewing text, data, image, video, and audio files, mobile computers, mobile data receivers, mobile data terminal, mobile phones, mobile radios, and mobile media players; media players; DVD players; televisions; set top boxes; consumer electronic devices, namely, cameras, camcorders, cable, satellite and terrestrial digital set-top boxes, digital video recorders; television set-top boxes, digital audio and video recorders and players, laser disc recorders and players, MP3 recorders and players, personal stereos, cable boxes, television monitors, audio cassette recorders and players, compact disc and recorders, global positioning system transmitters and receivers, photographic projectors, slide projectors, radio pagers, radios, scanners, telephone answering machines, video cassette recorders, video monitors, video tape recorders, voice messaging systems primarily comprised of computer hardware and software for the operation of voice messaging for receiving, storing and playing voice mail messages, pagers, laser disc recorders and players, electronic touch pads, television tuners, car broadcasting tuners, stereo tuners, and hybrid set-top boxes; game consoles and equipment, namely, set-top boxes for use in playing computer games, gaming machines in set-top boxes, computer game console and video game consoles, video game consoles for use with televisions and external display screens or monitor, video game machines for use with external display screen or monitor, and video game machines for use with televisions and computer monitors; computers; computer hardware; computer chips; cell phones; handheld devices, namely, portable media players; personal digital assistants (PDAs)ACTIVE—
035Promoting the interest of mobile device manufacturers through the development and adoption of certain computer memory interface, consumer electronic and mobile device design and manufacturing, computer software and computer hardware development, and system-on-chip and semiconductor intellectual property (lP) technologies; promoting the interest of mobile device manufacturers through the development and adoption of a memory interface technology and system-on-chip semiconductorsACTIVE—
042Product and material testing services; support services, namely, technical consultation and assistance in the fields of computer memory interface technologies, consumer electronic and mobile device design, computer software and computer hardware development, system-on-chip and semiconductor intellectual property (IP) technologiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 31, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance