Drawing for MACROPLEX

USPTO serial 77500206

MACROPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MACROPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barnard N. Madsen

Barnard N. Madsen FILLMORE SPENCER LLC3301 North University AvenueProvo, UT 84604-4438UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Essential oils for human use; Essential oils for use in manufacturing of dietary supplements in gelcap and non-gelcap form for human useACTIVE—
005Dietary and nutritional supplements for human useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 26, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 25, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance