USPTO serial 77500237
STAGE PRESENCE ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2011
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STAGE PRESENCE ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Portsmouth, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Virginia Beach, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Audio recording and production; Editing or recording of sounds and images; Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ringtones, pre-recorded music, video and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Production of sound and image recordings on sound and image carriers; Production of sound recordings; Providing audio or video studios; Providing voice overs for tapes, records and other recorded media; Record master production; Record production; Recording studio services; Recording studios; Sound recording studios | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 7, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Wata, Emilcka
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelley, Jeffrey K.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named STAGE PRESENCE ENTERTAINMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2010 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Sep 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |