Drawing for LW LAND WALKER

USPTO serial 77501184

LW LAND WALKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LW LAND WALKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Kenney

ROBERT J. KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Wheelchairs, Bicycles and their parts and fittings thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 17, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 20, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance