Drawing for MAGIC VID HOLOGRAM

USPTO serial 77501522

MAGIC VID HOLOGRAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGIC VID HOLOGRAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz

ROBERT B. G. HOROWITZ BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer generated holograms recorded on optical discsACTIVE—
016Hologram printed papers; hologram printed plastic and adhesive foils; holograms printed on sheet-like papers; papers for thread-holograms; paper; thread-hologram stickers; hologram printed seals; stationery; ink ribbons; holographic film labels; hologram processed prints; hologram printed trading cards; hologram printed plastic sheets; hologram printed plastic films; hologram printed plastic sheets used for the certification of genuine products and other plastic materialsACTIVE—
017Semi-finished plastic sheets for use in printing holograms; semi-finished plastic films for use in printing hologramsACTIVE—
037Pasting processing of hologram seals on identification cards, video recordings, electronic apparatus and medical productsACTIVE—
040Printing of holograms and printing services; manufacturing for others, namely, production of hologram images; printing services, namely, production of hologram images; rental of hologram printing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 23, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 6, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance