Drawing for CAGEFIVE

USPTO serial 77501961

CAGEFIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAGEFIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal L. Slifkin

NEAL L. SLIFKIN HARRIS BEACH PLLC99 GARNSEY RDPITTSFORD, NY 14534UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationery; printed matter, namely, books, magazines, periodicals, pamphlets, and brochure sin the field of sporting events; calendars, posters, photographs, printed tickets, business cards and maps; paper flags; paper bannersACTIVE—
024cloth flags; cloth bannersACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, shirts,shorts, pants, and socks; athletic clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, and socks, head wear; caps and visors; shirts; t-shirts; tank tops, dress shirts, jeans, sweaters; shorts; pants; jerseys; hoods; sweat shirts; sweat suits; gloves; jackets; vests; footwear; uniforms; shoes and running shoes; belts; beanies; wrist/head sweat bands; and sparring gear, namely, shirts, and shaftsACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, conducting sporting events in the nature of martial arts tournaments; organization and production of sporting and entertainment events, namely, martial arts tournaments, competitions and exhibitions rendered live, through broadcast media including television and radio, and via Internet rendered live or pre-recordedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 26, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance