USPTO serial 77502119
SHORTCUT TO BRILLIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHORTCUT TO BRILLIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Poliak
DANIEL C. POLIAK ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED801 NORTH 34TH STREETLEGAL DEPARTMENTSEATTLE, WA 98103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, computer programs for use in desktop publishing, electronic publishing, digital publishing, web publishing, graphic design, illustration, animation, imaging, typesetting or printing; computer programs for page layout and design; computer programs for creating, editing, manipulating, viewing, managing, indexing, cataloguing, sorting, organizing, storing, transferring, synchronizing, printing or exchanging digital photographs, digital or graphic images, data, text, audio, video, multimedia or interactive documents or recorded information; computer programs for artistic and technical drawing or illustration; computer programs for the creation, conversion, storage, annotation, manipulation, transfer, sharing or retrieval of electronic documents or forms; computer programs for web authoring; computer software used for the development, content creation, maintenance, administration or management of web sites; computer software for project management, asset management, file management, collaborative workflow, file sharing or file transfer via computer networks, wireless networks or global communication networks in the fields of graphic design or publishing; computer software to search, preview and track changes in electronic documents or files; computer software for electronic data management and tracking, file browsing, electronic data sharing, digital rights management or collaborative workflow automation; computer programs for accessing or converting photographic, digital or graphic images, data or text documents, audio, video or multimedia works, or recorded information to various file formats; computer software for creating, processing, exchanging or managing metadata, or machine-readable labels about information or content, in electronic files, databases and digital assets; computer software for accessing via a global computer network, searching, downloading, transferring or storing digital photographs, digital or graphic images, data, text, audio, video, multimedia or interactive documents or works, text documents or recorded information to computer media and printed instructional books and user manuals sold as a unit therewith; downloadable electronic publications, namely, user manuals and instructional books featuring information in the fields of computer software, desktop publishing, digital publishing, electronic publishing, printing, graphic design, digital imaging, digital photography and video, recorded on computer media and printed user manuals and instructional books sold as a unit therewith; downloadable electronic publications, namely, user manuals and instructional books in the fields of computer software, desktop publishing, digital publishing, electronic publishing, printing, graphic design, digital imaging, digital photography and video, recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |