Drawing for CAGE FIVE

USPTO serial 77502564

CAGE FIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CAGE FIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal L. Slifkin

NEAL L. SLIFKIN HARRIS BEACH PLLC99 GARNSEY RD.PITTSFORD, NY 14534UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016STATIONERY; PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, PERIODICALS, PAMPHLETS, AND BROCHURES IN THE FIELD OF SPORTING EVENTS; CALENDARS, POSTERS, PHOTOGRAPHS, PRINTED TICKETS, BUSINESS CARDS AND MAPS; PAPER FLAGS; PAPER BANNERSACTIVE—
024CLOTH FLAGS; CLOTH BANNERSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, AND SOCKS; ATHLETIC CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, AND SOCKS, HEADWEAR; CAPS AND VISORS; SHIRTS; T-SHIRTS; TANK TOPS, DRESS SHIFTS, JEANS, SWEATERS; SHORTS; PANTS; JERSEYS; HOODS; SWEAT SHIFTS; SWEAT SUITS; GLOVES; JACKETS; VESTS; FOOTWEAR; UNIFORMS; SHOES AND RUNNING SHOES; BELTS; BEANIES; WRIST/HEAD SWEAT BANDS; AND SPARRING GEAR, NAMELY, SHIRTS, AND SHORTSACTIVE—
028SPARRING GEAR, NAMELY, PROTECTIVE HEADGEAR, MOUTH GUARDS, GLOVES, PROTECTIVE ATHLETIC CUPS, AND SHIN GUARDSINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
041Entertainment services, namely, conducting sporting events in the nature of martial arts tournaments; ORGANIZATION AND PRODUCTION OF SPORTING AND ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS, NAMELY, MARTIAL ARTS TOURNAMENTS, COMPETITIONS AND EXHIBITIONS RENDERED LIVE, THROUGH BROADCAST MEDIA INCLUDING TELEVISION AND RADIO, AND VIA INTERNET RENDERED LIVE OR PRE-RECORDEDACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 5, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jun 23, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance