Drawing for DUALLY KRONE

USPTO serial 77502610

DUALLY KRONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUALLY KRONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi L. Sachs

HEIDI L. SACHS PERKINS COIE LLC1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008blades for impact hand toolsABANDONEDJun 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2009LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance