USPTO serial 77503197
MEXI-RAMEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3759783Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 2010
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEXI-RAMEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SPICES & SEASONINGS SPECIALITIES SDN. BHD.
SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MY
Other trademarks owned by SPICES & SEASONINGS SPECIALITIES SDN. BHD.
Changkat Raja Chulan,, MY
Changkat Raja Chulan,, MY
Changkat Raja Chulan,, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda Laura Nye
Amanda Laura Nye Amanda Nye Law Offices6 Davis Drive, Suite EBelvedere Tiburon, CA 94920UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, processed cereals, ready to eat cereals, baked goods, namely, cakes, and pastries, noodles and breads; glucose for food; gluten; syrups, namely, powered starch syrup, snack food chews made primarily from brown rice syrup, starch syrup, table syrup, topping syrup, carao fruit syrup for use as food, chocolate syrup, coffee flavored syrup, corn syrup, flavoring syrup, glutinous starch syrup, maple syrup, syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages, molasses syrup, pancake syrup, powdered starch syrup; mix for making combined noodle and sauce dish, noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages, organic curry sauces, honey, ice creams, sauces, namely, artichoke sauce, barbecue sauce, cheese sauce, chicken wing sauce, chili sauce, chocolate sauce, pepper sauce, dipping sauces, fish sauce, fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and apple sauce, hot sauce, pasta sauces, tomato-based sauces, picante sauce, pico de gallo sauce, pizza sauce, ready made sauces, salad sauces, sauce mixes, soy sauce, steak sauce, tartar sauce, teriyaki sauce, tomato sauce, and Worcestershire sauce; noodles, pastas, pastries, peanut confectionery, namely, peanut brittle; pizza, potato flour, pepper, pop corn, cake powder for making confections, namely, cake mixes and dessert instant mixes, relish condiments, ribbon vermicelli, and sandwiches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 4, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPICES & SEASONINGS SPECIALITIES SDN. BHD.
- Other trademarks owned by Amazing Food Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks owned by Amazing Food Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks owned by Amazing Food Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MEXI-RAMEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |