Drawing for QUICK & BRIGHT BOOSTER PADS

USPTO serial 77503292

QUICK & BRIGHT BOOSTER PADS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK & BRIGHT BOOSTER PADS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul F. Pedigo

Paul F. Pedigo Pedigo Law Firm PLLC6201 Fairview RoadSuite 200Charlotte, NC 28210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003NON-MEDICATED SKIN PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS, CHEMICAL PEELS AND CREAMS FOR THE FACE; MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND CREAMS FOR THE BODY; MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND CREAMS FOR THE HANDS; NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, CHEMICAL PEELS; SUN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SUNSCREEN, SUN CREAM, SUN TAN LOTION, SUN TAN GEL; CLEANING AND BATHING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, BATH AND SHOWER GELS; PRE-MOISTENED, NON-MEDICATED SKIN CLEANSING PADSACTIVE—
005MEDICATED SKIN PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, ACNE TREATMENT PREPARATIONS, CHEMICAL PEELS, ANTI-INFECTIVES, PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISORDERS, PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF ROSACEA, PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF PIGMENTATION DISORDERS AND UNEVEN PIGMENTATION; MEDICATED SKIN CLEANSING PADSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 4, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 2009PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Mar 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance