USPTO serial 77505157
CIRCUMSPECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3753636Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2010
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CIRCUMSPECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Machine Vision Consulting, Inc.
Sturbridge, MA
Machine Vision Consulting, Inc.
Sturbridge, MA
Machine Vision Consulting, Inc.
Westborough, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip Lotane
PHILIP LOTANE VENTURE ADVISORS LEGAL, P.C.43 Park LaneConcord, MA 01742UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Technological instruments, namely, computer hardware and software, for providing 360-degree inspection of and package integrity verification for labeled cylindrical containers, labels and lids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2007 |
| 042 | Technological services, namely, research and design related to the development and installation of computer hardware and software for technological instruments used for providing 360-degree inspection of and package integrity verification for labeled cylindrical containers, labels and lids | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Machine Vision Consulting, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Machine Vision Consulting, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Machine Vision Consulting, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CIRCUMSPECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |