Drawing for POLYONICS PROTECTED

USPTO serial 77506224

POLYONICS PROTECTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYONICS PROTECTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Wright

Mark A. Wright McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton, Professional900 Elm Street, PO Box 326MANCHESTER, NH 03105-0326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Adhesives for use in the lamination process that contain authentication markers to assist in anti-counterfeitingACTIVE—
016Blank or partially printed paper labels; ink ribbons; and industrial marking inks containing biologics for use in authentication of objects, that contain authentication markers to assist in anti-counterfeitingACTIVE—
017Electrical and masking tapes that contain authentication markers to assist in anti-counterfeitingACTIVE—
020Blank or partially printed plastic film labelsACTIVE—
042Design and implementation of technology solutions for the purpose of product authentication to protect products against counterfeiting; design and testing of new products and packaging for others to protect products and packaging against counterfeitingACTIVE—
045Consulting services, namely, consultation in the fields of product authentication and tracking to protect against counterfeitingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 16, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance