USPTO serial 77507220
BLUEBOTTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUEBOTTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-58675 Hemer, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Holt
WILLIAM H. HOLT LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM H. HOLT12311 HARBOR DRWOODBRIDGE, VA 22192-2224UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER SOFTENING APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS; FILTERS FOR WATER AND DRINKING WATER; INSTALLATIONS FOR WATER CONDUITS AND WATER PURIFICATION; APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF WATER AND DRINKING WATER; WATER DISPENSERS FOR COOLED AND UN-CHILLED (UN-COOLED) DRINKING WATER; APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS FOR FILLING DRINKING WATER TO BOTTLES; WATER CONDUITS IN CONNECTION WITH DEVICES FOR TRANSMITTING ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; FITTINGS WITH WATER FILTER FUNCTION FOR DRINKING WATER AND FOR WATER USED HEATING PLANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |