USPTO serial 77508233
HEALTHY FACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEALTHY FACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Naves, Jr.
7562 WISCASSET DRWEST HILLS, CA 91304-5298UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-sun lotions; Baby lotion; Bath lotion; Bathing lotions; Beauty lotions; Body lotion; Body lotions; Cosmetic olive oil for the face and body; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Face and body milk; Face creams; Face milk and lotions; Facial cleansers; Facial lotion; Hand lotions; Lip balm; Lip balm; Lip cream; Lip gloss; Liquid soaps for hands and face; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Lotions for face and body care; Non-medicated lip balm that does not contain beeswax; Non-medicated lip care preparations; Non-medicated lip protectors; Skin care preparations, namely, body balm; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing lotion; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Sun care lotions; Sun tan lotion; Sun-block lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |