USPTO serial 77509877
CHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Language Line University, a division of Language Line Services, Inc.
Monterey, CA
Other trademarks owned by Language Line University, a division of Language Line Services, Inc.
Language Line University, a division of Language Line Services, Inc.
Monterey, CA
Other trademarks owned by Language Line University, a division of Language Line Services, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Weinberg
Steven M. Weinberg Holmes Weinberg, PC30765 Pacific Coast HighwaySuite 411Malibu, CA 90265Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Language interpretation and translation services for the healthcare industry and healthcare providers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Language Line University, a division of Language Line Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Language Line University, a division of Language Line Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named CHI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |