Drawing for CHAIKEN AND CAPONE

USPTO serial 77510520

CHAIKEN AND CAPONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAIKEN AND CAPONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S. TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoes, outerwear, namely, rainwear, trench coats and wrapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Jun 13, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2011INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Apr 27, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 26, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 28, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2008CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Sep 30, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance