USPTO serial 77511656
FLO-MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787997Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLO-MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melanie T. Frazier, Esq.
Melanie T. Frazier, Esq. Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC450 W. Fourth StreetRoyal Oak, MI 48067-2557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Equipment not forming part of a machine and primarily made of metal, namely, manually operated valves, flow valves, transfer valves, for the storage, delivery or dispensing of gas or liquid materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |