USPTO serial 77512854
GOVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Deaver, Jr.
Albert B. Deaver, Jr. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP600 Travis Street3400 JPMorgan Chase TowerHouston, TX 77002-3095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cordless electric vacuum cleaners; brushes for vacuum cleaners; hoses for vacuum cleaners; suction nozzles for vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaner bags; vacuum cleaner hoses; all for commercial and industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |