USPTO serial 77513052
VIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Johnson
Maria Johnson De Novo Legal PC2244 Faraday Ave, Suite 103Carlsbad, CA 92008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books in the field of self-help, aromatherapy, skin care, body care, general health (not medical), motherhood and child rearing, and the use of aromatherapy for the five senses of sight, taste, touch, sound, smell, sense of purpose and well being; workbooks in the field of self-help, aromatherapy, skin care, body care, general health (not medical) motherhood, child rearing use of aromatherapy for the five senses of sight, taste, touch, sound, smell, sense of purpose and well being; manuals in the field of self-help, aromatherapy, skin care, body care, general health (not medical) motherhood and child rearing with the use of aromatherapy and essential oils for the five senses of sight, taste, touch, sound, smell, sense of purpose and well being; cookbooks, lifestyle books in the field of travel, cocktails and beverages, cookbooks using aromatherapy and essential oils based flavors, entertaining using aromatherapy, essential oils for the five senses of sight, taste, touch, sound, smell, sense of purpose and well being; printed publications, namely, informational brochures in the field of self-help, aromatherapy, skin care, body care, general health (not medical) motherhood, child rearing, and aromatherapy for use with the five senses of sight, taste, touch, sound, smell, sense of purpose and well being; cookbooks, lifestyle books in the field of travel, cocktails, beverages, cookbooks using essential oil based flavorings, entertaining using aromatherapy, essential oils and the five senses of sight, taste, touch, sound, smell, sense of purpose and well being; newsletters in the field of self-help, aromatherapy and essential oils skin care, body care, general health (not medical), travel, cocktails, beverages, cookbooks using aromatherapy and essential oil based flavors, entertaining, hosting utilizing aromatherapy and essential oils for the five senses - taste, touch, smell, sight, sound, sense of purpose and well being; written articles in the field of self-help, aromatherapy, skin care, body care, general health (not medical), travel, cocktails, beverages, cookbooks using and aromatherapy and essential oil based flavors, entertaining, hosting utilizing aromatherapy and essential oils for the five senses of taste, touch, smell, sight, sound, sense of purpose and well being; books for motherhood and child rearing that utilize aromatherapy and essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |