Drawing for HEALTHY SLEEP

USPTO serial 77513720

HEALTHY SLEEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY SLEEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent L. Carney

ROBERT E NAIL LOCKE LORD LLP2200 ROSS AVENUESUITE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Mattress and Pillow ProtectorsACTIVEOct 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 18, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 18, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 6, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 12, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 17, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 20, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 6, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 22, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 9, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 30, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 30, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 29, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 5, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance