USPTO serial 77513821
VEYANGE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VEYANGE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL A. THOMSON
DANIEL A. THOMSON EMERSON, THOMSON & BENNETT, LLC777 W MARKET STAKRON, OH 44303-1094UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal fittings for hydraulic hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Belts for conveyors; power transmission belts for use on machinery; Machines for crimping metal couplings to hydraulic hose; Synthetic rubber sold as a component of belts for machines, conveyor belts, and engines other than for land vehicles; Polyethylene coated fabric sold as a component of power transmission belts for machines; Air springs used in suspending heavy industrial machinery; Fan belts and accessory drive belts for engines for land vehicles; Machine water suction and discharge hose; Pressure washer machine hose; Synthetic self-lubricated rubber parts for land vehicle engines, namely, bushings and isolators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | V-belt measuring gauge for measuring length, width and depth of various parts of the belts; Electronic conveyor belt rip detection and misalignment system comprised of a computerized rip detector, alignment gauge, control unit and parts thereof; gauges used to measure the tension of power transmission belts; Electronic rip detection and misalignment system comprised of metal loops built into the belt, a computerized rip detector which detects the state of these metal loops, alignment gauge control unit and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Synthetic self-lubricated rubber parts for suspensions and transmissions for land vehicles, namely, brushings and isolators; Synthetic rubber sold as a component of land vehicle parts, namely, drive belts; polyethylene coated fabric sold as a component of land vehicle parts, namely, drive belts; Rubber tracks for land vehicles; Air springs used in suspending heavy vehicles; Land vehicle suspension components, namely, bellows; drive belts for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Non-metallic hose, namely, hot-air hose, non-metal hydraulic hoses, water and steam conveying hoses, non-metal petroleum hoses, water suction and discharge hoses, pressure washer hoses, non-metal hoses for conveying abrasive materials, and non-metal industrial hoses, all for use in the mining, agricultural, construction, industrial manufacturing, waste management, cement, fertilizer, salt, pharmaceutical, chemical, marine, petroleum, and food and beverage industries; Chlorinated polyethylene sold as an integral component of non-metal hoses for use in the mining, agricultural, construction, industrial manufacturing, waste management, cement, fertilizer, salt, pharmaceutical, chemical, marine, petroleum, and food and beverage industries; Automotive heater hose and air conditioning hose | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metallic hose fittings and connectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorship services in the fields of industrial maintenance, repair and operating parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VEYANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VEYANGE TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |