USPTO serial 77513955
ONEPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK C. YOUNG, REG. NO. 48,670
MARK C. YOUNG, REG. NO. 48,670 STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SECURITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | SECURITY CONSULTATION, NAMELY, MAINTAINING THE SECURITY AND INTEGRITY OF DATABASES CONTAINING RECORDS; SECURITY CONSULTATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADVICE REGARDING IMPROVEMENT OF BUSINESS SECURITY PROCEDURES AND PHYSICAL SECURITY, ALL WITH RESPECT TO RECORDS RETENTION, COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS, AND TECHNOLOGY SECURITY; SECURITY CONSULTATION, NAMELY, REVIEWING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL INSURANCE, BANKING, FINANCE, PRIVACY, TAXATION, HEALTHCARE, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, UTILITIES, EDUCATION, REAL ESTATE, MANUFACTURING, TRANSPORTATION, LEGAL, ENTERTAINMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGULATIONS AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS IN THE FIELDS OF INSURANCE, BANKING, FINANCE, PRIVACY, TAXATION, HEALTHCARE, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, UTILITIES, EDUCATION, REAL ESTATE, MANUFACTURING, TRANSPORTATION, LEGAL, ENTERTAINMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |